Skip to main content

Zwingli's understanding of baptism and communion as an "oath"

Ulrich Zwingli (d. 1531), like his contemporary Martin Luther (d. 1546), was a courageous reformer of the church, to whom Protestant Christians owe a debt of gratitude. He began his reform at Zurich in 1519 by preaching through the gospel of Matthew, reviving the practice of Chrysostom of consecutive Bible exposition. Zwingli simplified the worship of the church, purging it of unbiblical elements, and limiting it to what God had expressly commanded. In his theology, Zwingli exalted God's sovereign will in providence and salvation, and affirmed the chasmic difference between Creator and created. Zurich became a hub from where the Reformation spread out to other cities such as Berne, Strasburg and Geneva.  

On one point, however, Zwingli was deficient, namely in respect of baptism and the Lord's Supper.  

Zwingli's paradigm for understanding the sacraments was the Latin word sacramentum, equivalent to the German word "Eid". This referred to a soldier's oath of obedience. Zwingli understood the sacraments in terms of an expression of our allegiance to God: in baptism and the Supper we swear allegiance to God to obey him. "Baptism is an initiatory sign or badge initiating us to a lifelong mortification of the flesh and engaging us like a soldier at their enlistment." This is a different perspective from one whereby the sacraments are about God's action, means of grace which confirm God's promise of salvation to us in outward and tangible form. 

Moreover, Zwingli defended the practice of infant baptism vis-a-vis the Swiss Brethren ("Anabaptists"). In so doing, Zwingli drew on the parallel between New Testament circumcision and Old Testament baptism. In Zwingli's view, this sign of the covenant (circumcision under the Old Covenant, baptism under the New) was not only for believers, but also for their children, who are "holy" by virtue of a Christian parent (1 Cor 7:14). 

While, in Zwingli's view, baptism neither conferred the status of being "holy" (in his view Christian infants are born with this status), nor did delivered salvation, it *did* obligate infants to be Christians. Infant baptism, i.e. baptism when the person baptised is unable to make their own response, was understood to be the dedication of the child to God by the parent. 

To fail to baptise infants, or to make the baptism contingent upon the willingness of an adult to "opt in" to Christian faith and commitment, as was the case with the Swiss Brethren, appeared seditious, amounting to individuals and communities "opting out" of Christian society and rejecting their obligations, rather like citizens refusing enlistment "en masse". Incidentally, Anabaptists refused to take up arms in a society where military service to defend the Swiss cantons was a necessity. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The origin and spread of the early Baptist churches in the North West of England and elsewhere

The origins of Baptist churches go back to the 1600s.  The very first Baptist church began in 1609 and was for English speaking Christians based in the Netherlands, relocating to London in 1611 (Thomas Helwys). These churches were known as "General Baptists" and followed the theology of Arminius and the Anabaptists.  A second genesis of Baptist churches was in London in about 1638 (John Spilsbury). These churches followed the Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Synod of Dordt. In 1644, the First London Baptist Confession was signed by seven Baptist churches in the capital.  Baptist churches later spread from London outwards.  During the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651), there were Baptist Christians in the New Model Army of Oliver Cromwell. In 1648 the New Model Army campaigned in Lancashire during the Second Civil War.  1. John Wigan & the "Coldhouse cause"   During the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651), John Wigan (d. 1665),...

Die Erweckung (revival of evangelical Christianity in Germany in the 1800s)

Die Erweckung (literally, "the Revival") is a name for the revival of evangelical Christianity in Germany in the 1800s. It has overlap with the Réveil in Switzerland, France and the Netherlands, and also with the second Evangelical Revival in Britain and the Second Great Awakening in America. The Pietist movement, which began during the Baroque era around 1675 under the leadership of Philip Spener, had waned by the 1730s. By this time, Halle university, originally founded by Pietists and a flagship of the movement, became a centre for rationalism under academics such as Christian Wolff (1679–1754).  In the interim, Pietism was kept alive in part by a network of small groups (the Diaspora) which followed the spirituality of the Moravian Christians, a movement similar to Pietism but with its own church structures under the leadership of Von Zinzendorf. There was also the Basle-based Christentumsgesellschaft founded by Urlsperger in 1780, a society founded to counter the ratio...

Don't it always seem to go that you don't know you've got till it's gone

If you are old enough (or, young enough) to get the reference, the title of this blog post is a line from a 1970 song . The next line is, "They paved paradise, and put up a parking lot." This is a post about things that we have as Evangelical Christians, but perhaps have failed to cherish and value. These are reasons to stay Evangelical - even if other Christian traditions might at times seem appealing, tempting even. Evangelical Christianity is the faith I have received, the form of Christianity I was born into spiritually, and which has been my home since 1991. At least in this post, my concern is not to question the legitimacy of other Christian traditions, such as Roman Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy, or the faith of those brought up in those traditions, so much as to value my own tradition, and to encourage my fellow evangelicals to "stick with it" and "dig deeper" rather than going elsewhere. This blog is dedicated to a couple of dear friends who i...