Skip to main content

Does predestination mean that we are like robots bereft of any free will?

Something which comes up again and again in Christian circles is the question of free will and predestination. 

In this blog post, I would like to address one dimension of this. 

First of all, I should clarify that I am writing from the perspective of the "Five Points of Calvinism". While the theology of John Calvin, and Reformed Christianity as a whole, is far broader than this one issue, a central belief is that God has sovereignly chosen individuals to be saved in Christ, and has appointed the means by which that will be realised.

A very common objection raised against "Calvinism" is the false assumption that it must eliminate human free will. The whole situation can be, wrongly, understood in rather mechanical, deterministic terms, whereby God makes all the decisions and then implements them with humans cast in the role of "robots" who are coerced into believing in Christ and loving God. 

While, at times, "Calvinism" has been expressed and/or believed in a way that gets close to the caricature above, from very early on, the false view was explicitly addressed and repudiated in the historic confessions, in particular the Westminster Confession of 1647: 

"God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass: (Eph. 1:11, Rom. 11:33, Heb. 6:17, Rom. 9:15,18) yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, (James 1:13,17, 1 John 1:5) nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established." 

Likewise, in the earlier (1619) Canons of the Synod of Dordt (Article 16), we read the following words: 

"However, just as by the fall humans did not cease to be human, endowed with intellect and will, and just as sin, which has spread through the whole human race, did not abolish the nature of the human race but distorted and spiritually killed it, so also this divine grace of regeneration does not act in people as if they were blocks and stones; nor does it abolish the will and its properties or coerce a reluctant will by force, but spiritually revives, heals, reforms, and—in a manner at once pleasing and powerful—bends it back. As a result, a ready and sincere obedience of the Spirit now begins to prevail where before the rebellion and resistance of the flesh were completely dominant. In this the true and spiritual restoration and freedom of our will consists. Thus, if the marvelous Maker of every good thing were not dealing with us, we would have no hope of getting up from our fall by our own free choice, by which we plunged ourselves into ruin when still standing upright."

This point was also made in the 1700s by Christian thinkers Jonathan Edwards and Andrew Fuller. 

The point being made is that God's action, in graciously reviving us from our state of rebellion against him, acts upon us in such a way that we want to be believe in him, and love him and obey him. In the words of the Synod of Dordt above, "a ready and sincere obedience of the Spirit now begins to prevail". 

Now this still means that it is all down to God's grace. Leaving aside alternative understandings of God's grace (such as Arminian theology), God's grace does not merely free us up to make our own choice one way or the other. Rather, in the Calvinist/Reformed understanding, God's irresistible (invincible) grace wears down our unwillingness and winsomely works on us so that we really want to believe. 

By way of analogy, imagine a young woman who has caught the eye of a young man. She, however is unimpressed and has not "fallen for him". Think what might that young man do to win the affections of his beloved. How patient would he be to everything in his power for her to requite his love? Has he "made" her love him, or coerced her? No. And yet, his actions have the effect of winning her willing love.  She might even speak in terms of being "unable to resist" his charms. And yet the response is hers. It is she who, eventually, loves him back. If it were otherwise, he would feel it wasn't "true love". 

A similar analogy could be given of the parent winning over a recalcitrant teenager son or daughter. 

There is a patristic saying, ascribed to Augustine, "God created us without us, but He will not save us without us." What is meant is that when God created us, we did not exist and he brought us into existence. But when God saved us, we did already exist. Saving us involved working with pre-existent material, including our human will. God does not simply "override" our will, or "program" us, or give us a new will to replace the faulty old one, but rather he works to revive and heal our wills - which in due course are then able to believe.

"All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out." (John 6:37 NKJV)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bury, Greater Manchester - Timeline of churches

979?      First Church on the site of the present Parish Church (the picture below is an artist's impression of Bury parish church in 1485). This was the only church in the town of Bury until 1719 (see below).  1585      Parish church (re)built in the gothic style . 1650     During the Commonwealth, Henry Pendlebury was ordained for  Holcombe Chapelry.  1662     Having been ejected from the Church of England,  Henry Pendlebury of Holcombe   (1626-1695) held services at a Chapel on Bass Lane by Richard Kay, and others ejected from the C of E (replaced in 1712 by Dundee Chapel, Holcombe) 1669      The vicar of Bury parish reported to the Bishop of Chester that he heard several conventicles were "constantly kept at private houses of Independents, Presbyterians, Dippers and other such like jointly, of the bset rank of the yeomanry and other inferiors." 1689      ...

The origin and spread of the early Baptist churches in the North West of England and elsewhere

The origins of Baptist churches go back to the 1600s.  The very first Baptist church began in 1609 and was for English speaking Christians based in the Netherlands, relocating to London in 1611 (Thomas Helwys). These churches were known as "General Baptists" and followed the theology of Arminius and the Anabaptists.  A second genesis of Baptist churches was in London in about 1638 (John Spilsbury). These churches followed the Reformed Theology of John Calvin and the Synod of Dordt. In 1644, the First London Baptist Confession was signed by seven Baptist churches in the capital.  Baptist churches later spread from London outwards.  During the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651), there were Baptist Christians in the New Model Army of Oliver Cromwell. In 1648 the New Model Army campaigned in Lancashire during the Second Civil War.  1. John Wigan & the "Coldhouse cause"   During the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651), John Wigan (d. 1665),...

Die Erweckung (revival of evangelical Christianity in Germany in the 1800s)

Die Erweckung (literally, "the Revival") is a name for the revival of evangelical Christianity in Germany in the 1800s. It has overlap with the Réveil in Switzerland, France and the Netherlands, and also with the second Evangelical Revival in Britain and the Second Great Awakening in America. The Pietist movement, which began during the Baroque era around 1675 under the leadership of Philip Spener, had waned by the 1730s. By this time, Halle university, originally founded by Pietists and a flagship of the movement, became a centre for rationalism under academics such as Christian Wolff (1679–1754).  In the interim, Pietism was kept alive in part by a network of small groups (the Diaspora) which followed the spirituality of the Moravian Christians, a movement similar to Pietism but with its own church structures under the leadership of Von Zinzendorf. There was also the Basle-based Christentumsgesellschaft founded by Urlsperger in 1780, a society founded to counter the ratio...