Skip to main content

Wine or grape juice at Communion?

At my first church, St Paul's Brussels, and the churches where I served for 15 years in Russia, Communion was celebrated with proper wine, as was the custom in the Old Testament, and is the custom in Judaism. 

I cannot remember when I first participated in Communion and it was grape juice. It came as a bit of surprise. The taste is much more watery, and the experience likewise. As I will argue below, almost inevitably the change in the element (from wine to grape juice) changes what is communicated. 

I do understand that many brothers and sisters in our churches have a history with problem drinking and risk a relapse if Communion were celebrated with alcoholic wine. Some American missionaries I encountered in Russia actually considered it an issue of conscience NOT to celebrate communion with wine. 

My Protestant/evangelical instinct on these things is to go back to the Bible. What was used to celebrate the Passover and later Communion? 

Clearly, the "fruit of the vine" was wine. The reason the new wine requires new wineskins is the process of fermentation. In Luke 7, when Jesus is accused (wrongly) of being a winebibber it is clearly not a penchant for grape juice of which he is being accused. In relation to Jesus' first miracle at Cana, I have yet to hear a convincing interpretation of John 2:10 based on it being grape juice.  

The simplest thing, surely, is to celebrate communion with non-alcoholic wine. For those who are unsure, an alternative of grape juice could be offered. 

So, why is this a big deal? 

Well, the form we choose to do things always says something about what we think of it. 

If I retained the present translation of the Bible, but instead of a hardback bound book, used print outs in an usual font such as Curlz MT, it would still be God's word, but implicitly I would be taking that word less seriously. Likewise, if I added bubble bath to the water in the baptismal font, it would still be water, and the requirements of baptism met, but implicitly I would be dishonouring what the Lord had ordained as the sign for entry into the visible church and confirmation of the blessings of salvation. Likewise with Communion. n my own Baptist tradition, the quantity of water and the form of baptising is considered very important. The same should be true of the elements used for the Lord's Supper. 

When we celebrate communion with watery grape juice, we risk saying, "I can change this and it won't matter." 1 Corinthians 10:16-17, about participating in the body and blood of Christ, is still true with grape juice, but more convincingly if we actually follow what the Bible says. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The history of the Christian Church in twenty places

α. Jerusalem (30 or 33 AD) The place where Christ, the Son-of-God-become-man, died on the Cross, was raised from the dead on the third day, and from where he ascended back to heaven. This is also where the Holy Spirit was poured out on the first disciples. Sometime after AD 44 (Acts 12), Peter, John and other Apostles dispersed across the world to bear testimony to the risen Christ. 1. Ephesus (approx. 100 AD) The place where the Apostles, Paul and John, handed over to the next generation of Christian leaders, which included the “Apostolic Fathers”. One such “Apostolic Father”, Ignatius of Antioch, passed through Ephesus on his way to martyrdom at Rome, and addressed a letter to the church at Ephesus. 2. Athens (second century) The centre of Greek thought, which Justin Martyr and other Second Century Apologists addressed in their presentations of the Christian faith, proclaiming Christ as the Logos (the Word or principle underlying the universe). 3. Lyon (from 177) The church in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wilfrid of Ripon (634-709)

Our family recently visited Ripon in Yorkshire, an historic town associated with a figure called Wilfrid. On our visit to the Cathedral, it turned out that there was no biography available in the Cathedral shop, so I am minded to write my own. While this history is full of unfamiliar roles and concepts, nevertheless, these were our, albeit imperfect, Christian forefathers. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 3, warns of "boasting in men" and then goes on to say, "All things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future -- all are yours, and you are Christ's, and Christ is God's." It is in that spirit that I have penned the present brief life of Wilfrid of Ripon. The 600s is a long time ago, and at that time the map of our country looked quite different to the way it looks today. Just 200 years earlier, settlers (the Angles, Saxons and Jutes) had sailed across the North Sea from what is now Germany, Denmark and the...
Post a Comment
Read more

George of Lydda ("Saint George")

Saint George, the patron saint of England, was an historical figure, although many things ascribed to him are not historical.  George of Lydda was born into a noble family in an area called Cappadocia (now Turkey), which at the time was populated by Greek speaking citizens of the Roman Empire. George was born around 280. His mother appears to have come from Diospolis/Lydda (now known as Lod, near Tel Aviv), the place where he was later to die. When his father died, George and his mother moved back to the town of her birth.  George was a soldier in the Roman army at the time of Emperor Diocletian. When the protracted persecution of Christians unleashed by Diocletian began to be directed at Christians in the army, George was martryred by decapitation at Lydda in the year 303.  George's death was said to have inspired Empress Alexandra of Rome (d. 314) to become Christian.  The later stories of dragon-slaying are not historical and do not appear in early hagiographies (...
Post a Comment
Read more